@article{oai:nagano-nct.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000271,
 author = {金井, 辰郎},
 journal = {長野工業高等専門学校紀要},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {application, The particular expenses curve (PEC) by Marshall (1920) is a fallible concept. Marshall has often been accused of forgetting to take the producers' surplus (PS) into account in stating his taxbounty policy. But as Negishi (1999) pointed out, Marshall's ignorance of the PS should be vindicated because Marshall dealt with the tax-bounty policy in the long run, and so that the PEC should follow the slope of the price line horizontally. Examining Marshall's context, it seems that he described the PEC as a curve equivalent to the short-run supply (marginal cost) curve, and there it was a positively sloped curve. But as Negishi says, Marshall admitted that the PS could be zero particularly in the industrial section in the long run, and his discussion on the tax-bounty policy was about the long run. So if we draw the PEC in the long run, it should be horizontal to make the PS equal to zero, and his attitude to ignore the PS is utterly valid. Contrary to our way of thinking, Blaug (1978) insists that the PEC, even in the long run, should be drawn as a positively sloped curve. But he also has the same intention as us to make the PS equal to zero in the long run. In such a sense, there seems little difference between the end result of Blaug's line of thinking and our own.},
 pages = {65--75},
 title = {A.マーシャルの特定経費曲線と生産者余剰},
 volume = {34},
 year = {2000}
}