@article{oai:nagano-nct.repo.nii.ac.jp:00000066,
 author = {永藤, 壽宮 and 石川, 賢也},
 journal = {長野工業高等専門学校紀要, Memoirs of Nagano National College of Technology},
 month = {Jun},
 note = {The bridge removal method separates you greatly, and there are two. A method I divide it while the first puts a ground support under the bridge, and hanging it by a crane, and to remove, the second are the fulcrums or, in the neighborhood, cut the lower part of the bridge and are law to remove at a stretch. The latter continues having a good point that I finish cost cheaply predominantly in comparison with the former and has the bad point. The fall removal was said to have a problem in a safety and scattering thing. Most are based on experience, and this is because it lacked in a dynamics mark and grounds to investigate security analytically. This study provided data aiming at safe establishment by the fall removal method of the steel bridge.},
 title = {鋼橋の落下解析},
 volume = {46},
 year = {2012}
}